Mercedes CLK 1997 vs Mercedes CLK 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 4.3 | 2.0 - 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 279 HP | 136 - 347 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 400 NM | 190 - 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 - 11.5 seconds | 5.4 - 11.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 11.2 | 9.3 - 11.7 | |
|
Mercedes CLK 1997 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLK 1999. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.37 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes CLK 1997 and Mercedes CLK 1999 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 420 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`853 kg | ~ 1`869 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`355 kg | ~ 1`426 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 498 kg | ~ 443 kg | |
| Mercedes CLK 1997 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Mercedes CLK 1999. Therefore, Mercedes CLK 1997 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
| |