Mercedes CLK 1997 vs Mazda MX-6 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mercedes CLK is available with rear wheel drive, while Mazda MX-6 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 4.3 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 279 HP | 116 - 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 400 NM | 173 - 221 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 - 11.5 seconds | 8.5 - 10.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 11.2 | 8.0 - 9.8 | |
|
Mercedes CLK petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda MX-6. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.31 m | |
|
Mercedes CLK is smaller, but higher. Mercedes CLK is 5 cm shorter than the Mazda MX-6, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 404 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Mercedes CLK has 16 litres more trunk space than the Mazda MX-6. The Mazda MX-6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda MX-6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`853 | ~ 1`523 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda MX-6 has
| |