Mercedes CLK 1999 vs BMW 5 series 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 2.0 - 5.4 (petrol) | 2.0 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 - 347 HP | 115 - 286 HP | |
Torque: | 190 - 510 NM | 190 - 440 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 11.5 seconds | 6.2 - 12 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 - 11.7 | 5.9 - 12.2 | |
Mercedes CLK petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW 5 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.57 m | 4.78 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.44 m | |
Mercedes CLK is smaller. Mercedes CLK is 21 cm shorter than the BMW 5 series, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 460 litres | |
BMW 5 series has more luggage space. Mercedes CLK has 40 litres less trunk space than the BMW 5 series. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.3 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`869 | ~ 2`077 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 5200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |