Mercedes CLK 1999 vs Mercedes CLK 2002

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mercedes CLK
1999 - 2002
Mercedes CLK
2002 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 5.4 (petrol)1.8 - 5.4 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 136 - 347 HP163 - 367 HP
Torque: 190 - 510 NM240 - 510 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.4 - 11.5 seconds5.2 - 9.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.3 - 11.76.7 - 12.8
Mercedes CLK 1999 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLK 2002.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.57 m4.64 m
Width: 1.72 m1.74 m
Height: 1.37 m1.41 m
Mercedes CLK 1999 is smaller.
Mercedes CLK 1999 is 7 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK 2002, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK 1999 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 420 litres435 litres
Mercedes CLK 1999 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLK 2002.
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK 1999 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLK 2002.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`869~ 2`062
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 20003000
Pros and Cons: Mercedes CLK has
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Mercedes CLK has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv