Mercedes CLK 1999 vs Mercedes CLK 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 - 5.4 (petrol) | 1.8 - 5.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 - 347 HP | 163 - 367 HP | |
Torque: | 190 - 510 NM | 240 - 510 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 11.5 seconds | 5.2 - 9.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 - 11.7 | 6.7 - 12.8 | |
Mercedes CLK 1999 petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLK 2002. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.57 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.41 m | |
Mercedes CLK 1999 is smaller. Mercedes CLK 1999 is 7 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK 2002, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK 1999 is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 435 litres | |
Mercedes CLK 1999 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLK 2002. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK 1999 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLK 2002. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`869 | ~ 2`062 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 3000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |