Mercedes CLK 2002 vs Mercedes CLK 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 5.4 | 1.8 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 367 HP | 150 - 481 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 510 NM | 240 - 630 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.2 - 9.9 seconds | 4.7 - 10.4 seconds | |
| In general, Mercedes CLK 2005 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mercedes CLK 2002. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 12.8 | 6.4 - 14.2 | |
|
Mercedes CLK 2002 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLK 2005. On average, Mercedes CLK 2002 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK 2005. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes CLK 2002 is 1 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK 2005, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 435 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`062 kg | ~ 2`071 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`534 kg | ~ 1`544 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 528 kg | ~ 527 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |