Mercedes CLK 2002 vs BMW 3 series 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 5.4 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 367 HP | 143 - 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 510 NM | 200 - 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.2 - 9.9 seconds | 6.5 - 10 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 12.8 | 5.7 - 9.6 | |
|
Mercedes CLK petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 3 series. On average, Mercedes CLK equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.37 m | |
| Mercedes CLK is 15 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 410 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLK has more luggage capacity. Mercedes CLK has 25 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.8 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Mercedes CLK can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`062 | ~ 1`935 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |