Mercedes CLK 2005 vs Mercedes CLS 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes CLK is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Mercedes CLS is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 6.2 | 3.0 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 481 HP | 224 - 514 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 630 NM | 350 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.7 - 10.4 seconds | 4.5 - 7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 14.2 | 7.6 - 14.5 | |
|
Mercedes CLK petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLS. On average, Mercedes CLK equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLS. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Mercedes CLK is smaller, but slightly higher. Mercedes CLK is 26 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLS, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 505 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLS has more luggage space. Mercedes CLK has 70 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLS. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`071 | ~ 2`285 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
Mercedes CLS has
| |