Mercedes CLA 2013 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 156 HP | 323 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 278 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Mercedes CLA engine produces 167 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | no data | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Mercedes CLA) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Camaro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.84 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.92 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.36 m | |
Mercedes CLA is smaller, but higher. Mercedes CLA is 21 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLA is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 364 litres | |
Mercedes CLA has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mercedes CLA has 106 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. The Chevrolet Camaro may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`920 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 14 400 | 17 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLA has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |