Mercedes CL 2002 vs Mercedes CL 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.5 Petrol | 5.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 500 HP | 517 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 NM | 830 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 seconds | 4.6 seconds | |
|
Mercedes CL 2010 is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes CL 2002 engine produces 17 HP less power than Mercedes CL 2010, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Mercedes CL 2010. Due to the lower power, Mercedes CL 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.2 | 14.3 | |
|
The Mercedes CL 2002 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes CL 2002 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CL 2010, which means that by driving the Mercedes CL 2002 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 88 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| Mercedes CL 2002 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.99 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes CL 2002 is 8 cm shorter than the Mercedes CL 2010, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CL 2002 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 490 litres | |
|
Mercedes CL 2010 has more luggage space. Mercedes CL 2002 has 40 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CL 2010. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`620 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CL has
|
Mercedes CL has
| |