Mercedes CL 2002 vs Mercedes CL 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 306 HP | 435 HP | |
| Torque: | 460 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | 4.9 seconds | |
|
Mercedes CL 2010 is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes CL 2002 engine produces 129 HP less power than Mercedes CL 2010, whereas torque is 240 NM less than Mercedes CL 2010. Due to the lower power, Mercedes CL 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.9 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.6 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mercedes CL 2002 consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CL 2010, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes CL 2002 could require 360 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mercedes CL 2002 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CL 2010. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 88 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.99 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes CL 2002 is 8 cm shorter than the Mercedes CL 2010, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CL 2002 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 490 litres | |
|
Mercedes CL 2010 has more luggage space. Mercedes CL 2002 has 40 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CL 2010. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`585 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CL has
|
Mercedes CL has
| |