Mercedes CL 2002 vs Mercedes CL 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mercedes CL 2002 is available only with rear wheel drive, while Mercedes CL 2010 can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 5.0 - 5.5 | 4.7 - 6.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 306 - 500 HP | 435 - 630 HP | |
| Torque: | 460 - 800 NM | 700 - 1000 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 - 6.5 seconds | 4.4 - 4.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 - 14.7 | 9.5 - 14.3 | |
|
Mercedes CL 2002 petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CL 2010. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.99 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes CL 2002 is 8 cm shorter than the Mercedes CL 2010, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CL 2002 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 490 litres | |
|
Mercedes CL 2010 has more luggage space. Mercedes CL 2002 has 40 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CL 2010. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CL 2002 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mercedes CL 2010. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`100 | ~ 2`598 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CL has
|
Mercedes CL has
| |