Mercedes CL 2002 vs Dodge Charger 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mercedes CL is available only with rear wheel drive, while Dodge Charger can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 5.0 - 5.5 | 2.7 - 6.1 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 306 - 500 HP | 193 - 432 HP | |
| Torque: | 460 - 800 NM | 258 - 569 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 - 6.5 seconds | 4.9 - 6 seconds | |
| In general, Dodge Charger are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mercedes CL. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.4 - 14.7 | 9.8 - 14.7 | |
|
Mercedes CL petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Dodge Charger. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.99 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Mercedes CL is smaller. Mercedes CL is 9 cm shorter than the Dodge Charger, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CL is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 460 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CL is 0.4 metres less than that of the Dodge Charger, which means Mercedes CL can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`100 kg | ~ 2`185 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`810 kg | ~ 1`833 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 290 kg | ~ 352 kg | |
| Mercedes CL load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem less than Dodge Charger. Therefore, Dodge Charger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Dodge Charger has
| |