Mercedes CL 2006 vs Mercedes CLS 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 5.5 - 6.2 (petrol) | 2.1 - 5.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 388 - 612 HP | 204 - 557 HP | |
| Torque: | 530 - 999 NM | 370 - 720 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.4 - 5.4 seconds | 4.2 - 7.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.1 - 14.9 | 5.1 - 9.9 | |
|
Mercedes CL petrol engines consumes on average 4.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLS. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.06 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Mercedes CL is 12 cm longer than the Mercedes CLS, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 520 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLS has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mercedes CL has 30 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLS. This could mean that the Mercedes CL uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CL is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mercedes CLS, which means Mercedes CL can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`557 | ~ 2`321 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CL has
|
Mercedes CLS has
| |