Mercedes CL 2006 vs Dodge Charger 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 5.5 - 6.2 | 2.7 - 6.1 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 388 - 612 HP | 193 - 432 HP | |
| Torque: | 530 - 999 NM | 258 - 569 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.4 - 5.4 seconds | 4.9 - 6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.1 - 14.9 | 9.8 - 14.7 | |
|
Mercedes CL petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Dodge Charger. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.06 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Mercedes CL is smaller. Mercedes CL is 2 cm shorter than the Dodge Charger, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CL is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 460 litres | |
|
Mercedes CL has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mercedes CL has 30 litres more trunk space than the Dodge Charger. The Dodge Charger may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CL is 0.1 metres less than that of the Dodge Charger. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`557 | ~ 2`185 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CL has
|
Dodge Charger has
| |