Mercedes CL 2010 vs Ford Mustang 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Mercedes CL is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford Mustang can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 4.7 - 6.0 | 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 435 - 630 HP | 540 - 550 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 - 1000 NM | 691 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.4 - 4.9 seconds | 5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 14.3 | 13.1 - 13.9 | |
|
Mercedes CL petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Mustang. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
| Mercedes CL is 29 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CL is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 379 litres | |
|
Mercedes CL has more luggage capacity. Mercedes CL has 111 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CL is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford Mustang, which means Mercedes CL can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`598 | ~ 2`856 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 600 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CL has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |