Mercedes C class 2011 vs Mazda 3 2009

 
Mercedes C class
2011 - 2013
Mazda 3
2009 - 2011
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 204 HP105 HP
Torque: 310 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.2 seconds12.2 seconds
Mercedes C class is more dynamic to drive.
Mercedes C class engine produces 99 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 165 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Mercedes C class reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.46.3
Real fuel consumption: 9.0 l/100km7.5 l/100km
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mercedes C class consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes C class could require 15 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes C class consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
Fuel tank capacity: 59 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 920 km in combined cycle870 km in combined cycle
1150 km on highway1050 km on highway
650 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda 3) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes C class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 330'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 13 years16 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes SLKUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Mercedes C class engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.59 m4.58 m
Width: 1.77 m1.76 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes C class is 1 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes C class is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 475 litres430 litres
Mercedes C class has more luggage capacity.
Mercedes C class has 45 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes C class is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Mercedes C class can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0201`745
Safety:
Mazda 3 is better rated in child safety tests. The Mercedes C class scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
average

high
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes C class has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 74003200
Pros and Cons: Mercedes C klase has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • better safety assist technologies
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher children safety
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv