Mercedes C class 2013 vs Mercedes C class 2011
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 231 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 500 NM | 360 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
Mercedes C class 2013 is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes C class 2013 engine produces 95 HP more power than Mercedes C class 2011, whereas torque is 140 NM more than Mercedes C class 2011. Thanks to more power Mercedes C class 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 | 4.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
By specification Mercedes C class 2013 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class 2011, which means that by driving the Mercedes C class 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mercedes C class 2013 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class 2011. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.69 m | no data | |
Width: | 1.81 m | no data | |
Height: | 1.44 m | no data | |
Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.22 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes C class 2013 is 0.42 metres more than that of the Mercedes C class 2011, which means Mercedes C class 2013 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`195 | no data | |
Safety: | |||
Mercedes C class 2013 is better rated in child safety tests. The Mercedes C class 2011 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 28 000 | 7600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes C klase has
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |