Mercedes C class 2013 vs Mercedes C class 2011

 
Mercedes C class
2013 -
Mercedes C class
2011 - 2013
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.1 Diesel2.1 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 204 HP204 HP
Torque: 500 NM500 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.9 seconds7.1 seconds
Mercedes C class 2013 and Mercedes C class 2011 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mercedes C class 2013 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.06.4
Real fuel consumption: 6.8 l/100km8.0 l/100km
The Mercedes C class 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mercedes C class 2013 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class 2011, which means that by driving the Mercedes C class 2013 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes C class 2013 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class 2011.
Fuel tank capacity: 66 litres66 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1320 km in combined cycle1030 km in combined cycle
1490 km on highway1320 km on highway
970 km with real consumption820 km with real consumption
Mercedes C class 2013 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 14 years14 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.69 m4.59 m
Width: 1.81 m1.77 m
Height: 1.44 m1.45 m
Mercedes C class 2013 is larger, but slightly lower.
Mercedes C class 2013 is 10 cm longer than the Mercedes C class 2011, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 480 litres475 litres
Mercedes C class 2013 has 5 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes C class 2011.
Turning diameter: 11.22 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes C class 2013 is 0.42 metres more than that of the Mercedes C class 2011, which means Mercedes C class 2013 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`2252`190
Safety:
Mercedes C class 2013 is better rated in child safety tests. The Mercedes C class 2011 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 28 0009000
Pros and Cons: Mercedes C klase has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher children safety
Mercedes C klase has
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv