Mercedes C class 2002 vs Mercedes CLK 1999
| Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.2 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mercedes C class) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mercedes CLK) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 224 HP | |
| Torque: | 540 NM | 315 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
|
Mercedes C class is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes C class engine produces 7 HP more power than Mercedes CLK, whereas torque is 225 NM more than Mercedes CLK. Thanks to more power Mercedes C class reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 10.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes C class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes C class consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK, which means that by driving the Mercedes C class over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes C class consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 770 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes C class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.37 m | |
| Mercedes C class is 4 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes C class is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 420 litres | |
|
Mercedes C class has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mercedes CLK may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes C class is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mercedes CLK. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`135 kg | 1`920 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`580 kg | 1`495 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 555 kg | 425 kg | |
| Mercedes C class load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 23 procentiem more than Mercedes CLK. Therefore, Mercedes C class is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Mercedes CLK has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes C class has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mercedes CLK, so Mercedes CLK quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes C klase has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |