Mercedes C class 2002 vs Mercedes CLK 1999
Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 2.6 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 170 HP | 193 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 280 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
Mercedes CLK is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes C class engine produces 23 HP less power than Mercedes CLK, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Mercedes CLK. Due to the lower power, Mercedes C class reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 9.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.8 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
The Mercedes CLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes C class consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes C class could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes C class consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
750 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
570 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
Mercedes CLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 520'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes CLK engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes CLK | Used also on Mercedes SLK | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes C class might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.53 m | 4.57 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.37 m | |
Mercedes C class is 4 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes C class is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 420 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes C class is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mercedes CLK. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`850 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes C klase has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |