Mercedes C class 2000 vs Ford Mondeo 1996

 
Mercedes C class
2000 - 2004
Ford Mondeo
1996 - 2000
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.1 Diesel1.8 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 143 HP90 HP
Torque: 315 NM177 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds13.2 seconds
Mercedes C class is more dynamic to drive.
Mercedes C class engine produces 53 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 138 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Thanks to more power Mercedes C class reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.76.3
Real fuel consumption: 7.2 l/100km6.8 l/100km
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mercedes C class consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes C class could require 60 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes C class consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 920 km in combined cycle980 km in combined cycle
1210 km on highway1290 km on highway
860 km with real consumption910 km with real consumption
Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Ford Mondeo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes C class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 560'000 km280'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes C class engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 9 years7 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mercedes E klaseUsed also on Ford Escort
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Mercedes C class engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.53 m4.56 m
Width: 1.73 m1.75 m
Height: 1.43 m1.37 m
Mercedes C class is smaller, but higher.
Mercedes C class is 3 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes C class is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data470 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1290 litres
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes C class is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Mercedes C class can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5001`855
Safety:
Quality:
above average

average
Mercedes C class has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Mondeo, so Mercedes C class quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 1400600
Rating in user reviews: 7.9/10 8.3/10
Pros and Cons: Mercedes C klase has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • higher safety
Ford Mondeo has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv