Mercedes C class 2000 vs Mercedes CLK 1999

	Mercedes C class 2000 - 2002	Mercedes CLK 1999 - 2000
Body:	Sedan	Coupe
Gearbox:	Manual	Manual
Engine:	2.0 Petrol	2.0 Petrol
Performance
Power:	129 HP	136 HP
Torque:	185 NM	190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	11 seconds	11 seconds
	Mercedes C class engine produces 7 HP less power than Mercedes CLK, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Mercedes CLK.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	9.4	9.4
Fuel tank capacity:	62 litres	62 litres
Full fuel tank distance:	650 km in combined cycle	650 km in combined cycle
	910 km on highway	870 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions
Length:	4.53 m	4.57 m
Width:	1.73 m	1.72 m
Height:	1.43 m	1.37 m
	Mercedes C class is 4 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes C class is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity:	455 litres	420 litres
	Mercedes C class has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mercedes CLK may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter:	10.8 meters	10.7 meters
	The turning circle of the Mercedes C class is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mercedes CLK.
Gross weight:	1`935 kg	1`800 kg
Net weight:	1`380 kg	1`300 kg
Load capacity:	555 kg	500 kg
	Mercedes C class load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than Mercedes CLK. Therefore, Mercedes C class is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.

Safety:		no data
Quality:	average	average
Average price (€):	1600	3000
Pros and Cons:	Mercedes C klase has roomier boot higher carrying (cargo) capacity fewer faults lower price	Mercedes CLK has more power
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Mercedes C class 2000 vs Mercedes CLK 1999

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions