Mercedes C class 2001 vs Volvo V40 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Mercedes C class is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes C class engine produces 68 HP more power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 185 NM more than Volvo V40. Thanks to more power Mercedes C class reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo V40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes C class consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes C class could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes C class consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo V40) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes C class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Mercedes C class is larger. Mercedes C class is 6 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes C class is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1420 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes C class is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Mercedes C class has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V40 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mercedes C class, so Mercedes C class quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes C klase has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |