Mercedes C class 2004 vs Volvo S60 2005

 
Mercedes C class
2004 - 2005
Volvo S60
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.1 Diesel2.4 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 150 HP163 HP
Torque: 340 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.3 seconds9.7 seconds
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving.
Mercedes C class engine produces 13 HP less power than Volvo S60, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Mercedes C class reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.57.5
The Mercedes C class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mercedes C class consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Mercedes C class over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 950 km in combined cycle930 km in combined cycle
1190 km on highway1160 km on highway

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Engines

Engine production duration: 8 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes VitoInstalled on at least 6 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo XC90, Volvo XC70, Volvo C30
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.53 m4.60 m
Width: 1.73 m1.80 m
Height: 1.43 m1.43 m
Mercedes C class is smaller.
Mercedes C class is 7 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: no data424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes C class is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo S60.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5002`050
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

below average
Volvo S60 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes C class has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably better
Average price (€): 32003200
Rating in user reviews: 7.4/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons: Mercedes C klase has
  • timing chain engine
  • lower fuel consumption
Volvo S60 has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv