Mercedes C class 2004 vs Volvo S60 2004

	Mercedes C class 2004 - 2007	Volvo S60 2004 - 2009
Gearbox:	Automatic	Automatic
Engine:	1.8 Petrol	2.0 Petrol
Performance
Power:	143 HP	180 HP
Torque:	220 NM	240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	9.9 seconds	9.5 seconds
	Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes C class engine produces 37 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Mercedes C class reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	8.4	10.0
Real fuel consumption:	9.0 l/100km	10.0 l/100km
	The Mercedes C class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes C class consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Mercedes C class over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes C class consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60.
Fuel tank capacity:	62 litres	70 litres
Full fuel tank distance:	730 km in combined cycle	700 km in combined cycle
	980 km on highway	920 km on highway
	680 km with real consumption	700 km with real consumption

Drive type
Wheel drive type:	Rear wheel drive (RWD)	Front wheel drive (FWD)

Mercedes C klase 2004 1.8 engine: The most notable issue with this engine is the sticking of exhaust valves due to carbon buildup. Another significant problem is the unreliable timing chain, which can stretch by 100,000 km. Early symptoms of a ... More about Mercedes C klase 2004 1.8 engine
Dimensions
Length:	4.53 m	4.58 m
Width:	1.73 m	1.80 m
Height:	1.43 m	1.43 m
	Mercedes C class is smaller. Mercedes C class is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity:	no data	424 litres
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down	no data	1034 litres
Turning diameter:	10.8 meters	11 meters
	The turning circle of the Mercedes C class is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo S60.
Gross weight (kg):	1`500	2`030

Safety:	no data	no data
Quality:	low	below average
	Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes C class has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably better
Average price (€):	3000	2800
Rating in user reviews:	7.4/10	8.5/10
Pros and Cons:	Mercedes C klase has lower fuel consumption	Volvo S60 has more power fewer faults higher ratings in user reviews lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Mercedes C class 2004 vs Volvo S60 2004

Performance

Fuel consumption

Drive type

Dimensions