Mercedes C class 2007 vs Seat Exeo 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Mercedes C class is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes C class engine produces 50 HP more power than Seat Exeo, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Seat Exeo. Thanks to more power Mercedes C class reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Exeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes C class consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Exeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes C class could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes C class consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Exeo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1550 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 1120 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Seat Exeo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes C class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes C class is 7 cm shorter than the Seat Exeo, width is practically the same , while the height of Mercedes C class is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 485 litres | 442 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1500 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes C class has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Seat Exeo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`205 kg | 2`050 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Mercedes C class has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Exeo has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mercedes C class, so Mercedes C class quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes C klase has
|
Seat Exeo has
| |