Mercedes C class 2018 vs Renault Megane 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Mercedes C class is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes C class engine produces 69 HP more power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 124 NM more than Renault Megane. Thanks to more power Mercedes C class reaches 100 km/h speed 5.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.6 | |
| Mercedes C class consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes C class could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 49 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 92 mm (3.6 inches) | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Megane can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Megane version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Renault Megane 2016 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not particularly demanding on fuel quality.
The most critical ... More about Renault Megane 2016 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes C class is 5 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes C class is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`175 kg | 1`837 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`520 kg | 1`287 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 655 kg | 550 kg | |
| Mercedes C class load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem more than Renault Megane. Therefore, Mercedes C class is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 24 200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes C klase has
|
Renault Megane has
| |