Mercedes C class 2019 vs Renault Megane 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 258 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 370 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.7 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Mercedes C class is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes C class engine produces 143 HP more power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 214 NM more than Renault Megane. Thanks to more power Mercedes C class reaches 100 km/h speed 7.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.6 | |
|
The Renault Megane is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes C class consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes C class could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 49 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes C class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 92 mm (3.6 inches) | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Megane can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Megane version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Renault Megane 2016 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not particularly demanding on fuel quality.
The most critical ... More about Renault Megane 2016 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes C class is 5 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes C class is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | 550 litres | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mercedes C class uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`195 kg | 1`837 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`540 kg | 1`287 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 655 kg | 550 kg | |
| Mercedes C class load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem more than Renault Megane. Therefore, Mercedes C class is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 24 200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes C klase has
|
Renault Megane has
| |