Mercedes C class 2019 vs Renault Megane 2016
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Mercedes C class) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Renault Megane) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 211 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Mercedes C class is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes C class engine produces 96 HP more power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 194 NM more than Renault Megane. Thanks to more power Mercedes C class reaches 100 km/h speed 7.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 1.6 l/100km + 13.9 kWh/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 7.20 € | 12.30 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/lElectricity€/kWh | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 49 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | no data | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Renault Megane) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes C class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Renault Megane 2016 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not particularly demanding on fuel quality.
The most critical ... More about Renault Megane 2016 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes C class is 5 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes C class is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 550 litres | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mercedes C class uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes C class is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Megane. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`350 kg | 1`837 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`740 kg | 1`287 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 610 kg | 550 kg | |
| Mercedes C class load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem more than Renault Megane. Therefore, Mercedes C class is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 24 200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes C klase has
|
Renault Megane has
| |