Mercedes C class 2019 vs Nissan Sentra 2016
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Mercedes C class) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Nissan Sentra) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 211 HP | 124 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 169 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mercedes C class engine produces 87 HP more power than Nissan Sentra, whereas torque is 181 NM more than Nissan Sentra. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 1.6 l/100km + 13.9 kWh/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 7.20 € | 13.70 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/lElectricity€/kWh | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | no data | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Nissan Sentra) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes C class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Mercedes C class is larger, but lower. Mercedes C class is 5 cm longer than the Nissan Sentra, 8 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes C class is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 428 litres | |
|
Nissan Sentra has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mercedes C class uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes C class is 0.4 metres more than that of the Nissan Sentra, which means Mercedes C class can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`350 kg | 1`758 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`740 kg | 1`304 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 610 kg | 454 kg | |
| Mercedes C class load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 26 procentiem more than Nissan Sentra. Therefore, Mercedes C class is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes C klase has
|
Nissan Sentra has
| |