Mercedes C class 2011 vs Mercedes C class 2013
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Mercedes C class 2011 engine produces 84 HP more power than Mercedes C class 2013. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes C class 2013 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes C class 2011 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class 2013, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes C class 2011 could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes C class 2011 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class 2013. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 510 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes C class 2011 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mercedes C class 2011 is smaller. Mercedes C class 2011 is 10 cm shorter than the Mercedes C class 2013, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes C class 2011 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Mercedes C class 2013 has more luggage space. Mercedes C class 2011 has 30 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes C class 2013. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.22 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`020 kg | 1`990 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 25 600 | 27 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes C klase has
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |