Mercedes C class 2011 vs Ford Mustang 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 5.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 540 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 691 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5 seconds | |
| Mercedes C class engine produces 300 HP less power than Ford Mustang. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 13.9 | |
|
The Mercedes C class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes C class consumes 7.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that by driving the Mercedes C class over 15,000 km in a year you can save 1110 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 430 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 570 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes C class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Mercedes C class is smaller, but slightly higher. Mercedes C class is 19 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes C class is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 368 litres | |
|
Mercedes C class has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mercedes C class has 82 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mustang. The Ford Mustang may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | 2`856 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 600 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes C klase has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |