Mercedes C class 2011 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 328 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 377 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
| Mercedes C class engine produces 88 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 10.9 | |
|
The Mercedes C class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes C class consumes 4.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the Mercedes C class over 15,000 km in a year you can save 660 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Mercedes C class is smaller, but higher. Mercedes C class is 25 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes C class is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 364 litres | |
|
Mercedes C class has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mercedes C class has 86 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. The Chevrolet Camaro may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 800 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes C klase has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |