Mercedes C class 2011 vs Audi TT 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
| Mercedes C class engine produces 80 HP more power than Audi TT. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes C class consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes C class could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes C class consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes C class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.35 m | |
| Mercedes C class is 40 cm longer than the Audi TT, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes C class is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 292 litres | |
|
Mercedes C class has more luggage capacity. Mercedes C class has 158 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | 1`660 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Audi TT has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mercedes C class, so Audi TT quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 24 800 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes C klase has
|
Audi TT has
| |