Mercedes C class 2011 vs BMW 3 series 2010
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 156 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 210 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
Mercedes C class engine produces 14 HP less power than BMW 3 series, but torque is 40 NM more than BMW 3 series. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.8 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 63 litres | |
720 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes C class engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 13 years | 6 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes CLK, Mercedes SLK | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 1 sērija | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes C class might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Mercedes C klase 2011 1.8 engine: The most notable issue with this engine is the sticking of exhaust valves due to carbon buildup. Another significant problem is the unreliable timing chain, which can stretch by 100,000 km. Early symptoms of a ... More about Mercedes C klase 2011 1.8 engine BMW 3 sērija 2010 2.0 engine: The BMW N43 engine is built around a lightweight alloy cylinder block with a twin-cam, 16-valve head. It uses a dual-pump fuel delivery system—one located inside the tank to transfer fuel and supply the high-pressure pump, which then boosts fuel pressure up to 200 bar. Notably, the system lacks a fine fuel filter and relies only on a ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.59 m | 4.61 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.40 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes C class is 2 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes C class is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 440 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Mercedes C class has 10 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series. The BMW 3 series may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes C class is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`990 | 1`840 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 25 200 | 11 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes C klase has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |