Mercedes C class 2007 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Mercedes C class is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes C class engine produces 30 HP more power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer. Thanks to more power Mercedes C class reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes C class consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes C class could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes C class consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mitsubishi Lancer) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes C class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Mercedes C class is larger, but lower. Mercedes C class is 1 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes C class is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 475 litres | 400 litres | |
|
Mercedes C class has more luggage capacity. Mercedes C class has 75 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes C class is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means Mercedes C class can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`920 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes C klase has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |