Mercedes C class 2018 vs Renault Megane 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mercedes C class is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Renault Megane can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 4.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Mercedes C class is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 - 510 HP | 90 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 - 700 NM | 156 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4 - 10 seconds | 10.5 - 13.7 seconds | |
| In general, Mercedes C class are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Renault Megane. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 1.6 - 9.9 | 3.7 - 6.6 | |
|
Mercedes C class petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Megane. On average, Mercedes C class equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 90 - 92 mm (3.5 - 3.6 inches) | 136 mm (5.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Megane can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes C class is 6 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes C class is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 987 litres | |
|
Renault Megane has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mercedes C class uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes C class is 0.8 metres more than that of the Renault Megane, which means Mercedes C class can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`177 kg | ~ 1`850 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`546 kg | ~ 1`301 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 631 kg | ~ 549 kg | |
| Mercedes C class load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem more than Renault Megane. Therefore, Mercedes C class is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 24 200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes C klase has
|
Renault Megane has
| |