Mercedes C class 2000 vs Mercedes CLK 1999

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

	Mercedes C class 2000 - 2004	Mercedes CLK 1999 - 2002
Body:	Sedan	Coupe
Gearbox:	Manual/Automatic	Manual/Automatic
Wheel drive type:	Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)	Rear wheel drive (RWD)
	Mercedes C class is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mercedes CLK can be equipped only with rear wheel drive.
Engines:	1.8 - 3.2 (petrol, diesel)	2.0 - 5.4 (petrol)
Performance
Power:	115 - 354 HP	136 - 347 HP
Torque:	185 - 540 NM	190 - 510 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	5.2 - 12.1 seconds	5.4 - 11.5 seconds
	Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	6.1 - 11.5	9.3 - 11.7
	On average, the Mercedes C class petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Mercedes CLK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions
Length:	4.53 m	4.57 m
Width:	1.73 m	1.72 m
Height:	1.43 m	1.37 m
	Mercedes C class is 4 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes C class is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity:	no data	420 litres
Turning diameter:	10.8 meters	10.7 meters
	The turning circle of the Mercedes C class is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mercedes CLK.
Gross weight (kg):	~ 1`500	~ 1`869

Safety:		no data
Quality:	average	average
Average price (€):	1600	2000
Pros and Cons:	Mercedes C klase has available with 4x4 drive petrol and diesel engines available fewer faults lower price	Mercedes CLK has only petrol engines available
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Mercedes C class 2000 vs Mercedes CLK 1999

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions