Mercedes C class 2004 vs Volvo S60 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mercedes C class
2004 - 2007
Volvo S60
2004 - 2009
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mercedes C class is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo S60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mercedes C class also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 1.8 - 5.42.0 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 122 - 367 HP126 - 300 HP
Torque: 220 - 540 NM192 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.2 - 11.9 seconds5.7 - 12 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.1 - 11.96.4 - 13.0
Mercedes C class petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S60. On average, Mercedes C class equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.53 m4.59 m
Width: 1.73 m1.80 m
Height: 1.43 m1.43 m
Mercedes C class is smaller.
Mercedes C class is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 455 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
Mercedes C class has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Mercedes C class has 31 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters13 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes C class is 2.2 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Mercedes C class can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`629~ 2`031
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 32003200
Rating in user reviews: 7.4/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons: Mercedes C klase has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Volvo S60 has
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv