Mercedes B class 2012 vs Volkswagen Touran 2010
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 300 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
Mercedes B class engine produces 4 HP less power than Volkswagen Touran, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volkswagen Touran. Despite less power, Mercedes B class reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 5.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
The Mercedes B class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes B class consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that by driving the Mercedes B class over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes B class consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
1280 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
810 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 390'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes A klase, Mercedes CLA | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.36 m | 4.40 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.56 m | 1.67 m | |
Mercedes B class is smaller. Mercedes B class is 4 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Touran, width is practically the same , while the height of Mercedes B class is 12 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 488 litres | 695 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1547 litres | 1989 litres | |
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage space. Mercedes B class has 207 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Touran. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 442 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes B class is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`025 | 2`190 | |
Safety: | |||
Volkswagen Touran is better rated in child safety tests. The Mercedes B class scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | high | below average | |
Mercedes B class has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Touran has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Mercedes B class, so Mercedes B class quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 6800 | 6400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes B klase has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |