Mazda Xedos 9 1998 vs Volvo S80 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Mazda Xedos 9) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Volvo S80) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 214 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 295 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Mazda Xedos 9 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda Xedos 9 engine produces 74 HP more power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Volvo S80. Thanks to more power Mazda Xedos 9 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 6.4 | |
|
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda Xedos 9 consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Xedos 9 could require 540 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1630 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.43 m | |
| Mazda Xedos 9 and Volvo S80 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1106 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Xedos 9 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo S80, which means Mazda Xedos 9 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`985 kg | 2`140 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`500 kg | 1`550 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 485 kg | 590 kg | |
| Mazda Xedos 9 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem less than Volvo S80. Therefore, Volvo S80 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Xedos 9 has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |