Mazda Xedos 9 1998 vs Rover 75 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 214 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 295 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Mazda Xedos 9 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda Xedos 9 engine produces 98 HP more power than Rover 75, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Rover 75. Thanks to more power Mazda Xedos 9 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 5.8 | |
|
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda Xedos 9 consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Xedos 9 could require 630 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda Xedos 9 is 7 cm longer than the Rover 75, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda Xedos 9 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 432 litres | |
| Mazda Xedos 9 has 2 litres less trunk space than the Rover 75. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Xedos 9 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Rover 75. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`985 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Xedos 9 has
|
Rover 75 has
| |