Mazda Xedos 9 1998 vs Rover 400 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 214 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 295 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Mazda Xedos 9 engine produces 39 HP more power than Rover 400, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Rover 400. Despite the higher power, Mazda Xedos 9 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 10.2 | |
| Mazda Xedos 9 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400, which means that by driving the Mazda Xedos 9 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 530 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 680 km on highway | ||
| Mazda Xedos 9 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Mazda Xedos 9 is larger. Mazda Xedos 9 is 33 cm longer than the Rover 400, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mazda Xedos 9 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
|
Rover 400 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda Xedos 9 has 40 litres less trunk space than the Rover 400. This could mean that the Mazda Xedos 9 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`985 | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Xedos 9 has
|
Rover 400 has
| |