Mazda Xedos 9 1998 vs Chevrolet Malibu 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 214 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 295 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Mazda Xedos 9 engine produces 62 HP more power than Chevrolet Malibu, whereas torque is 85 NM more than Chevrolet Malibu. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 9.0 | |
|
The Chevrolet Malibu is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda Xedos 9 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Malibu, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Xedos 9 could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Mazda Xedos 9 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda Xedos 9 is 2 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Malibu, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda Xedos 9 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 464 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Xedos 9 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Malibu, which means Mazda Xedos 9 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`985 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Xedos 9 has
|
Chevrolet Malibu has
| |