Mazda Xedos 9 1998 vs Rover 400 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 146 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Rover 400 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda Xedos 9 engine produces 10 HP more power than Rover 400, but torque is 5 NM less than Rover 400. Despite the higher power, Mazda Xedos 9 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 8.6 | |
| Mazda Xedos 9 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Xedos 9 could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| Mazda Xedos 9 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Xedos 6 | Used also on Rover 200 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda Xedos 9 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Mazda Xedos 9 is larger. Mazda Xedos 9 is 33 cm longer than the Rover 400, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mazda Xedos 9 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 810 litres | |
|
Rover 400 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda Xedos 9 has 40 litres less trunk space than the Rover 400. This could mean that the Mazda Xedos 9 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Xedos 9 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Rover 400, which means Mazda Xedos 9 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Xedos 9 has
|
Rover 400 has
| |