Mazda Xedos 9 1993 vs Chrysler 300M 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 216 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Chrysler 300M is a more dynamic driving. Mazda Xedos 9 engine produces 84 HP less power than Chrysler 300M, whereas torque is 124 NM less than Chrysler 300M. Due to the lower power, Mazda Xedos 9 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 10.7 | |
|
The Mazda Xedos 9 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda Xedos 9 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300M, which means that by driving the Mazda Xedos 9 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| Mazda Xedos 9 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mazda Xedos 9 is smaller. Mazda Xedos 9 is 18 cm shorter than the Chrysler 300M, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda Xedos 9 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 530 litres | |
|
Chrysler 300M has more luggage space. Mazda Xedos 9 has 100 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300M. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Xedos 9 has
|
Chrysler 300M has
| |