Mazda Xedos 9 1993 vs Mazda 626 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 146 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 173 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Mazda Xedos 9 engine produces 29 HP more power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Mazda 626. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda Xedos 9 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Xedos 9 could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda Xedos 9 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda 626 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Xedos 6 | Used also on Mazda MX-6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda Xedos 9 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Mazda Xedos 9 is larger. Mazda Xedos 9 is 12 cm longer than the Mazda 626, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 452 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda Xedos 9 has 22 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626. This could mean that the Mazda Xedos 9 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Xedos 9 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mazda 626, which means Mazda Xedos 9 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`645 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Xedos 9 has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |