Mazda Xedos 9 2001 vs Audi A6 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 164 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 212 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Audi A6 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda Xedos 9 engine produces 16 HP less power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 158 NM less than Audi A6. Due to the lower power, Mazda Xedos 9 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 8.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda Xedos 9 consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Xedos 9 could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda Xedos 9 consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Audi A6 2001: The vehicle features full-time Quattro IV all-wheel drive with Torsen center differential and electronic traction control, which operates at speeds up to 40 km/h (25 mph) and applies braking to spinning wheels, with the effect of locking the front and rear differentials. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda Xedos 9 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda MX-6 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A8 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda Xedos 9 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.45 m | |
| Mazda Xedos 9 is 8 cm longer than the Audi A6, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda Xedos 9 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 551 litres | |
|
Audi A6 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda Xedos 9 has 121 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. This could mean that the Mazda Xedos 9 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Xedos 9 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi A6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 2`260 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Xedos 9 has
|
Audi A6 has
| |