Mazda Xedos 9 2001 vs Chrysler Sebring 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 164 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 212 NM | 262 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is a more dynamic driving. Mazda Xedos 9 engine produces 39 HP less power than Chrysler Sebring, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Chrysler Sebring. Due to the lower power, Mazda Xedos 9 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 10.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Chrysler Sebring is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda Xedos 9 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Xedos 9 could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda Xedos 9 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda Xedos 9 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda Xedos 9 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda MX-6 | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Chrysler 300M, Dodge Intrepid | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Sebring might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda Xedos 9 is 4 cm longer than the Chrysler Sebring, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda Xedos 9 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 455 litres | |
|
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda Xedos 9 has 25 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Sebring. This could mean that the Mazda Xedos 9 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Xedos 9 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Xedos 9 has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |