Mazda Xedos 9 1998 vs Chevrolet Malibu 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda Xedos 9 is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Chevrolet Malibu is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.4 - 3.1 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 146 - 214 HP | 152 - 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 - 295 NM | 210 - 264 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 11.1 seconds | 9 - 9.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 10.1 | 9.0 - 10.2 | |
|
Mazda Xedos 9 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Malibu. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda Xedos 9 is 2 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Malibu, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda Xedos 9 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 464 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Xedos 9 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Malibu, which means Mazda Xedos 9 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`951 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Xedos 9 has
|
Chevrolet Malibu has
| |